Comparison
Raindrop files it. This one reads it.
Raindrop is genuinely good and its free tier is more generous than ours for pure bookmarking — unlimited bookmarks, with the cap falling on collections rather than saves, and Pro at about $3.15 a month. If what you want is a fast, tidy place to file links, use Raindrop. Norget solves a different problem: it stores the readable text of each page and answers questions from it, quoting which of your own saves each claim came from.
When not to pick us
Pick Raindrop if you want unlimited free bookmarks, nested collections, and a polished way to organise links by hand. It is cheaper than us and better at filing.
| What | Norget | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Free bookmarks | 100 saved items | The alternative wins this row. Unlimited, 5 collections of 100 |
| Paid price | $6 / month | The alternative wins this row. About $3.15 / month annually |
| Nested collections | Flat collections | The alternative wins this row. Yes |
| Archives the page text | Yes, on every save | Comparable. Full-text search on Pro |
| Ask a question, get an answer | Norget wins this row. Yes, with citations | Search, plus an MCP server |
| Search by meaning | Norget wins this row. Yes — semantic over your text | Keyword full-text on Pro |
Questions
Raindrop has an MCP server now. Is that the same thing?
Related but not the same. Raindrop’s MCP server lets an outside assistant like Claude query your bookmarks, which is genuinely useful if you already work in one. Norget answers inside the product, over the archived text rather than the bookmark metadata, and shows which of your saves each part of the answer came from. If you live in Claude already, Raindrop plus MCP may suit you better.
Can I use both?
Yes, and some people should. Raindrop as the tidy filing cabinet, Norget for the material you actually want to interrogate later. Both export, so neither locks you in.